In a speech in December 1969, U.S. Secretary of State William P. Rogers stated that “any change to existing lines [1949 armistice] should not reflect the weight of conquest and be limited to changes that are not essential to mutual security. We do not support expansionism.  Stephen M. Schwebel, a Harvard professor, replied: “… Changes to the 1949 ceasefire lines between these states within the former Palestinian territory are legal (if not necessarily desirable), whether they are “non-substantial changes necessary for mutual security” or more substantial changes, such as the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over all Jerusalem. In a footnote, he wrote: “It should be added that the 1949 ceasefire agreements explicitly preserved the territorial claims of all parties and do not purport to establish definitive boundaries between them.”  The area demarcated in point 2.A of the Memorandum of 13 November 1948 on the implementation of the Security Council resolution of 4 November 1948, to the south and west of the line, from its starting point in the west to point MR 12581196, then south along the Hatta-Al-Faluja – RJ road to MR 12140823 – Beersheba and ending north of Bir Asluj at point 402. 1967, after Israel had conquered all territories other than the emirate of Transjordan from the former Palestinian duty and other territories, the demarcation lines became militarily irrelevant, and the status of the Green Line became uncertain. (2) U.N.doc S/1070 (call for the withdrawal of troops from Positions held by America and for the establishment of permanent ceasefire lines and neutral zones) and S/1080 (call for a ceasefire); U.N. Security Council, Official Documents, Third Year, Supplement to November 1918, 7 and 13-14. Previous The UN has set up monitoring and reporting agencies to monitor established ceasefire lines.
In addition, discussions on the implementation of the ceasefire led to the signing of the separate 1950 tripartite declaration between the United States, Britain and France. They pledged to take measures inside and outside the United Nations to prevent border crossings or ceasefire lines. He also presented their commitment to peace and stability in the region, their refusal to use or threaten violence, and reaffirmed his opposition to the development of an arms race. These lines continued until the six-day war of 1967. The withdrawal operation will begin on 26 February 1949 at 0500 GMT and will be placed under the control and control of the United Nations throughout the surveillance and control of the United Nations. During the six-day war, Israel occupied territories beyond the Green Line, inhabited by more than a million Palestinian Arabs, including refugees from the 1947-1949 war.  The Green Line remained the administrative border between these territories (except Jerusalem) and the territories on the Israeli side of the Green Line. The 1949 ceasefire agreements are a series of ceasefire agreements signed in 1949 between Israel and neighbouring Egypt Lebanon Jordan and Syria to officially end the official hostilities of the 1948 Arab-Israeli war and establish ceasefire lines between Iraqi Israeli and Jordanian forces, also known as the Green Line. The Israel-Lebanon GAA was signed on 23 March 1949 by Lieutenant-Colonel Mordekhai Makleff for Israel and Lieutenant-Colonel Tawfiq Salim for Lebanon in Raes Naqura.
The Israeli troops, who had withdrawn from parts of southern Lebanon they occupied in the summer of 1948, agreed to set the limits of the marking of the armistice along the former international borders, thus introducing greater stability in Israeli-Lebanese relations for more than twenty years. After the “Black September” of 1970, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the various Palestinian guerrilla groups moved the site of their operations from Jordan to the refugee camps in Lebanon, making the Israel-Lebanon border a recurring battleground.